posted by Mike Madison at 8:22 AM /
Pittsburghers woke up this morning to front-page P-G coverage of a story that's been circulating Mt. Lebanon for several days: Some number of high school students, presumably boys, assembled and circulated a grotesque "list" of high school girls.
The weak-kneed response of the School District so far, especially as described in the paper, is almost as grotesque as the list itself. The Superintendent referred the matter to the Mt. Lebanon Police. Rightly, I think, the Department has concluded that this isn't a criminal problem. Instead, it's the District's problem. Among the District leaders quoted in the Post-Gazette, only Mark Hart seems to have a grasp of the seriousness of the issue and of the District's role.
Isn't anyone at the School District paying attention to what's going on these days on the Duke campus? When school leaders have their heads in the sand, first bad things happen, and then it gets worse. Failure to act strongly in this case -- that is, failure to exercise some *leadership* -- will have profound consequences later on. It won't be pretty.
Does the District have authority to act here? Of course it does. This doesn't need to get wrapped up in what constitutes "sexual harassment." It's bullying, plain and simple, and the District has to have a policy against bullying. Doesn't it?
And should the District act? Of course again.
Step one: Identify all of the students involved. The students know who is responsible for this. In all probability, parents do, too, or will soon. If necessary, bring every student in the school in for Q&A, starting with the seniors.
Step two: Punish them, and punish any adult employees of the District who had any knowledge that this was going on.
Step three: Immediately and publicly re-declare a zero-tolerance policy regarding bullying, at all ages and grade levels.
Step four: Initiate a comprehensive review of Mt. Lebanon's vaunted and nationally-recognized Character Education program, which now appears to be a complete failure.
I went to the District website this morning and did a search on the word "Character." Here's what I got back: "Search the MTLSD Web Sites for: character. Total Records Returned: 0. Your search did not produce any results."
Shameful.
UPDATE #1 (4/27): The Post-Gazette follows the story. Unfortunately, the story focuses more on the battle of the lawyers rather than on educational and ethical issues.
The Trib has an interesting story about an underappreciated aspect of this situation: Internet technology magnifies the effect of rumor and innuendo in ways that neither schools nor students really appreciate. A piece of paper that gets passed around doesn't cause harm on the scale of an email or website (or MySpace or facebook) that gets sent around. I asked my kids whether Mt. Lebanon High School offers any instruction in the *ethics* of technology. Answer: No.
UPDATE #2 (4/27): Just in case that it's not otherwise obvious from the format of this blog, this post represents my views alone. (The Comments represent the views of their respective authors.) To avoid any appearance of a possible conflict of interest, however, Josephine Posti, who is a member of the School Board, has withdrawn from her association with the blog as a whole. I thank Jo for her earlier contributions and wish her well in everything.
The weak-kneed response of the School District so far, especially as described in the paper, is almost as grotesque as the list itself. The Superintendent referred the matter to the Mt. Lebanon Police. Rightly, I think, the Department has concluded that this isn't a criminal problem. Instead, it's the District's problem. Among the District leaders quoted in the Post-Gazette, only Mark Hart seems to have a grasp of the seriousness of the issue and of the District's role.
Isn't anyone at the School District paying attention to what's going on these days on the Duke campus? When school leaders have their heads in the sand, first bad things happen, and then it gets worse. Failure to act strongly in this case -- that is, failure to exercise some *leadership* -- will have profound consequences later on. It won't be pretty.
Does the District have authority to act here? Of course it does. This doesn't need to get wrapped up in what constitutes "sexual harassment." It's bullying, plain and simple, and the District has to have a policy against bullying. Doesn't it?
And should the District act? Of course again.
Step one: Identify all of the students involved. The students know who is responsible for this. In all probability, parents do, too, or will soon. If necessary, bring every student in the school in for Q&A, starting with the seniors.
Step two: Punish them, and punish any adult employees of the District who had any knowledge that this was going on.
Step three: Immediately and publicly re-declare a zero-tolerance policy regarding bullying, at all ages and grade levels.
Step four: Initiate a comprehensive review of Mt. Lebanon's vaunted and nationally-recognized Character Education program, which now appears to be a complete failure.
I went to the District website this morning and did a search on the word "Character." Here's what I got back: "Search the MTLSD Web Sites for: character. Total Records Returned: 0. Your search did not produce any results."
Shameful.
UPDATE #1 (4/27): The Post-Gazette follows the story. Unfortunately, the story focuses more on the battle of the lawyers rather than on educational and ethical issues.
The Trib has an interesting story about an underappreciated aspect of this situation: Internet technology magnifies the effect of rumor and innuendo in ways that neither schools nor students really appreciate. A piece of paper that gets passed around doesn't cause harm on the scale of an email or website (or MySpace or facebook) that gets sent around. I asked my kids whether Mt. Lebanon High School offers any instruction in the *ethics* of technology. Answer: No.
UPDATE #2 (4/27): Just in case that it's not otherwise obvious from the format of this blog, this post represents my views alone. (The Comments represent the views of their respective authors.) To avoid any appearance of a possible conflict of interest, however, Josephine Posti, who is a member of the School Board, has withdrawn from her association with the blog as a whole. I thank Jo for her earlier contributions and wish her well in everything.
4 Comments:
I completely agree with Mike's comments assessment of this situation, and his suggestions about what should be done; with one addition. If it is shown that any employees of the district were aware of this they should be repremanded (fired, but the Pa. unions won't let that happen) and the public should know who they are. Of course, the board and administration will hide behind their never-ending mantra - it's a personnel issue and we can't discuss it. I also agree with Anthony's statement that parents need to "shoulder their share of the blame", however if this is like other incidents in the past, they will be the first to threaten to sue the district.
Character education has not worked recently in Mt. Lebanon. My daughter was a student in the district from '93-'98 and we heard incredible stories.
Bottom line is that lists like the "top 25" encourages harassment. Harassment is illegal. Therefore...
The "boys will be boys" excuse and the "we did it, too, when we were in high school" excuse are just that -- excuses for ignorance and unacknowledged bias (at best) and misogyny and abuse (at worse). The truth is that the harm suffered by the women and girls on this list is real, and it is unjustifiable in any civilized society. Personally, from what I've read and heard so far, I don't see anything that should be reviewed in a courtroom, but I see plenty that should be reviewed in the principals' office and in parents' living rooms. (Mark Hart's call for firings may be over the top, but his outrage is palpable and welcome.) High school students who believe that they can get away with this sort of thing eventually come to believe that they can get away with much worse. The community should put a stop to it while it can.
I think that it would be a shame if anyone took this episode as a reason to reject Mt. Lebanon High School or public education generally and to prefer private school as an alternative. Private schools suffer from this sort of behavior, too. (I know; I went to one myself, and I get reports from friends who have kids in private schools today.) The question for any educational setting, public or private, is the quality of the adult leadership.
Post a Comment
<< Home