Saturday, August 07, 2010

Letter: Senate Bill Would Require “Super Majority” Vote to Raise School Property Taxes

In this letter to the editors of Blog-Lebo, Sue Dixon writes about a Pennsylvania Senate bill that would require school boards to make a two-thirds majority vote before raising property taxes. —Tom


Senate Bill Would Require “Super Majority” Vote to Raise School Property Taxes

Dear Editors,

I spoke to Senator Rafferty's office today and they said this bill was sent from the Education Committee to the Appropriations committee on June 29th, 2010. Since legislators are on recess until September 20th at 1:00 p.m., nothing is happening with this bill until they return. I have found that legislators are very easy to work with and you can make changes in how your government is run through legislation. If this bill doesn't move forward before the end of November it will be unable to move forward because this will be the end of the legislation cycle for this year.

Senator Rafferty's office said that a few school board members (Senator Rafferty’s office did not say which school district the school board members were from and they could be from anywhere in the state) have contacted them saying this bill would hold their budgets hostage and they wouldn’t be able to pass budgets.

Everyone in this state should be contacting their legislator and the Senators on the Appropriations Committee to share their opinions regarding Senate Bill 553 moving forward. I have provided the Press Release, the Bill in its entirety, and the contact information for all of the Senators on the Appropriations Committee.

Sue Dixon
Mt. Lebanon



For Immediate Release on June 8, 2010

Senate Education Committee Approves Rafferty Measure (Senate Bill 553) Requiring Super Majority Vote to Raise School Property Taxes

The Senate Education Committee today approved legislation sponsored by Sen. John Rafferty (R-Montgomery) that would require a "super majority" vote for school boards to raise taxes.

Senate Bill 553 would amend the Public School Code to require all millage property tax increases to be approved by a two-thirds majority vote by the members elected to the board of school directors.

"Taxpayers are rightfully concerned that property taxes continue to increase, as does school spending," Rafferty said. "Many tax increases are being passed by a single vote. I believe there should be a compelling need and strong support by the board before property taxes go up."

Rafferty said his legislation would provide greater taxpayer protections and ensure that school boards of directors first seek to control spending before raising taxes.

"Taxpayers have repeatedly told us that they want a stronger say in taxing decisions," he said. "My bill will provide an added protection against tax increases because it will raise the bar when it comes to voting for an increase."

"This is an important move to rein in property tax increase and control spending," Rafferty added.




The exact wording of this bill follows:

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SENATE BILL No. 553
Session of 2009

INTRODUCED BY RAFFERTY, FERLO, BROWNE, WASHINGTON, EARLL, WAUGH, WONDERLING AND BOSCOLA, MARCH 5, 2009

REFERRED TO EDUCATION, MARCH 5, 2009 - REREFERRED TO THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE, JUNE 29 2010

AN ACT

Amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), entitled "An act relating to the public school system, including certain provisions applicable as well to private and parochial schools; amending, revising, consolidating and changing the laws relating thereto," in school finances, providing for millage rate increase. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

Section 1. The act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, is amended by adding a section to read:
Section 602.1. Millage Rate Increase.--The millage rate of tax in effect in each school district on the effective date of this section shall not be increased in any succeeding year unless approved by a two-thirds majority vote by members elected to the board of school directors.
Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.




APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

Officers
Corman, Jake , Chair
Tomlinson, Robert M., Vice Chair
Costa, Jay , Minority Chair
Stack, Michael J., Minority Vice Chair
Pileggi, Dominic, ex-officio
Mellow, Robert J., ex-officio
Scarnati, Joseph B., III, ex-officio

Majority
Argall, David G.
Baker, Lisa
Browne, Patrick M.
Brubaker, Mike
Gordner, John R.
Greenleaf, Stewart J.
Pippy, John
Rafferty, John C., Jr.
Smucker, Lloyd K.
Vance, Patricia H.
Waugh, Michael L.
White, Mary Jo

Minority
Boscola, Lisa M.
Farnese, Jr., Lawrence M.
Logan, Sean
Musto, Raphael J.
Stout, J. Barry
Tartaglione, Christine M.
Wozniak, John N.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's a noble thought, and I am sure our good State Senator John Pippy supports the intent if not the letter of the Bill. However, there are too many powerful special interest groups in PA whose members feed at the public trough. They finance a collective lobby who will see to it that this Bill, like all others similar to it in the past, either dies in Committee, or will be amended to death or voted down if it would somehow ever reach the floor. Even if it somehow survives into law here's what can happen :

A major provision of Act 1 enacted in 2006 was supposed to accomplish something approaching this Bill. But the voting public does not know the what can happen to "laws" in PA that the bottom feeders at the public trough don't particularly like. Laws require regulations which result in implementing procedures which in turn require official written guidelines for the government agencies (and public who have to deal with them) to follow. Seldom do the guidelines bear a real strong resemblence in these circumstances to the intent of the drafters of the original Bill.

Act 1 and the entire PlanCon process used for school projects are classic illustrative examples. The implementing guidelines are full of loopholes, waiver allowances, exemptions and exceptions that allow school districts , if they run into any so-called regulatory impediments or restrictions, to merely *check the box(es)provided (to explain away or *justify* problems) and move forward*. And their forms are obsolete (expired), as are the data required....and they know it!

I wish it were all otherwise; and, I wish Senator Rafferty and his co-sponsors all the best. Don't get your hopes up. This is PA.

Bill Lewis

August 08, 2010 5:40 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home