Carbolic Smoke Ball Strikes Again
Link: carbolicsmokeblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/halloween-decorating-gets-competitive.html
Dear Joe:
In classic logical fallacy , October’s Mt. Lebanon Magazine is courting community support for “The TIF.” My first reaction was “Oh my goodness!”
My second was to put pen to paper – but I am not sure where to begin. The $100,000 heated sidewalk? Or the now $95,000 parking spaces (each)? Or the other “infrastructure” improvements which might be standard fare for any development of $500,000 condominiums and retail shops?
After reading the Magazine, I am unsure what evaluating a hotel or apartment building has to do with whether or not the Zamagias Properties development warrants a substantial public subsidy? Besides, those ideas were off the table 18 months ago.
I also question how can we take incremental credit for EIT to be generated by residents of Washington Park, if a considerable portion of potential residents may already reside in Mt. Lebanon? My mom now lives in Woodridge, as do bunches of other long-term Mt. Lebanon residents. I assume Main Line residents have similar roots. Why will Washington Park be different? A more meaningful analysis would identify the projected “net new” EIT.
The Municipality’s supporting information for this column projects an average household (EIT) income of $161,234 for Washington Park. This might be accurate, but if the “net new” is what matters, using the median household (EIT) income for all of Mt. Lebanon would be more instructive. This number is likely in the $85,000 – $95,000 range.
Then there are these questions and answers from the supporting information on the web site:
Q. Why are we “subsidizing” Zamagias with Tax Increment Financing? A. We are not
Q. Why are we “giving away” tax revenues to Zamagias? A. We are not
Oh yes we are – on both counts – if the Municipality is victorious with this tax diversion.
Another huge point of contention is the TIF/NID discussion . The continued use of TIF and NID in the same context demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of these economic development tools. But for giggles, say NDC developed the site and established a NID – which effectively is an assessment on their residents and their residents only. We could still have all the purported economic benefits of Washington Park and an additional $3,000,000+ in real estate taxes (present value), to boot.
It may be simplistic, but I still see this TIF as unnecessarily supporting a project where a portion of the mortgage is paid with taxes, while the rest of the community pays our mortgage and our taxes.
Justice Louis D. Brandeis offers some insight into the TIF dialogue:
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding."
I do not comprehend the zeal in the Municipality.
I do appreciate the School Board’s thoughtful and purposeful consideration of the issue.
Respectfully,
William R. Matthews
Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Public propaganda: What's really outrageous about "official" Mt. Lebanon pushing for an equally outrageous tax-increment financing, or TIF, package for a tony condominium project is that it's using taxpayer dollars to do so. There's a one-side shilling in the official community magazine. And there's even a Web site that falsely states a TIF is not a public subsidy. Residents should take great offense that their "leaders" think them such pushovers for such an obvious con game.
In short, what we see in Mt. Lebanon, I think, is the failure of the region to include African Americans in its economic growth. When the region boomed, obviously, the exclusion was based on race. Now, with the region declining economically in an era in which racism is considered immoral by some or at least declasse by others, we are seeing the effects of indifference and cluelessness. In short, as much as "affirmative action" is decried as either unworkable or 'reverse discrimination" we cannot reverse the effects of discrimination without actively trying to reverse it. In short, political and civic leaders have to develop a strategy that will end the economic isolation of the black community. When this is done, we'll see more African Americans in Mt. Lebanon.
Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Friday, October 13, 2006
On the "Watch List": Mt. Lebanon magazine. The house organ of the South Hills community has been pushing hard for a tax-increment-financing package to help the developer of a tony condominium project. But will it publish a dissenting point of view? Jake Haulk, president of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, has penned such a dissent, dated Oct. 5. Will the magazine publish it? We'll be very surprised if it does.
"For decades, it was an unwritten rule that many minorities, including African Americans and Jews, could not buy houses in certain neighborhoods, according to Ruth Reidbord, one of the first community relations board members in Mt. Lebanon. Even real estate brokers said that, if they showed homes to minorities, they were threatened, said Elaine Wittlin, who believes she was one of the first to ignore such threats."
"So, in 1966, town convened a Community Relations Board to promote a feeling of openness.
'Community groups and residents can work together to reduce the barriers that sometimes separate population groups,' Mt. Lebanon Manager Stephen Feller said.
Has it worked?"
"[i]n the municipality of 33,017 people, 31,766 are listed as Caucasians, 202 as black, 767 as Asians and 263 people are of Hispanic or Latino background, according to the 2000 census."Check my math, but I think that means that fewer than 1% of the town's population is African-American. Just over 2% is Asian, and it looks like that figure includes both south Asian and east Asian populations. The Hispanic/Latino figure is consistent with Pittsburgh's small overall Hispanic/Latino population, but its size relative to the African-American community is striking.
"[A]at 7:30 p.m. Wednesday in the municipal building, 710 Washington Road, at a forum titled "Where Are We Going? Where Have We Been?" Five people will address quality of life issues for mixed-race families, people with disabilities, lesbians and gays, teens and people who practice less common religions."
Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Subsidy shilling: It's simply astounding how "official" Mt. Lebanon keeps shilling for a massive tax subsidy in promotion of a developer's tony condo complex. The July/August issue of Mt. Lebanon magazine, the South Hills community house organ, ran a one-sided explanation of tax-increment financing. Now, in its October issue, Commissioner David Humphreys offers an even longer defense. Mr. Humphreys even claims such "a development will not require a penny of taxpayers' money." Truth in government this is not.
One of the reasons a condominium project is desirable is that the residents would pay a large earned income tax annually.
HELP!! TWO YEARS AGO DUQUESNT LIGHT TOOK DOWN OVER 11 TREES FROM MY BACKYARD. NOW THEY'RE BACK INTENDING TO BUTCHER WHAT MIGHT BE THE OLDEST TREE IN MT. LEBANON. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY TREE EXPERTS THAT IT IS A 175 YEAR OLD SILVER MAPLE. MT LEBANON DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE AN INTEREST. ANY IDEAS AS TO WHO CAN HELP QUICKLY??