Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Blockbuster Development in Lebo High School Renovation Process

Dirk Taylor, lifelong Mt. Lebanon resident and longtime structural engineering advisor to the Mt. Lebanon School District, recently delivered to incoming Superintendent Timothy Steinhauer and the entire Board a careful yet blistering criticism of the Mt. Lebanon School Board's process and proposal to renovate the Mt. Lebanon High School.

Complete copies of his materials will be posted shortly for everyone to read, and there will be more coverage of the submission here at Blog-Lebo and, perhaps, elsewhere. For now, relevant excerpts include the following (posted with permission):


I received a copy of the current Schematic Design being presented from your office on July17th. After reviewing the plans in detail, along with comparing them to the current high school plans, I am concerned that the ommunity at large has not been given full factual information. In fact, it is my opinion that misleading and inaccurate statements presented throughout the evaluation process have resulted in very poor decisions regarding the direction this project has taken.



The current High School has been described in numerous presentations to the community by the Project Architects as a non-functional building that is proven not to work. Considering that for decades Mt. Lebanon High School has consistently ranked and continues to rank among the best high schools in the region, state, and nation in every significant category, including academics, athletics, fine arts, graduation rate, college attendance, and ultimate success of its students in the adult world this statement is puzzling. There can be no serious debate regarding the success of our students, whose achievements are well-documented public information.

To state that the current building is non-functional suggests a lack of understanding of what has been going on in the building. I imagine that the authors of that statement can provide documentation of various national studies used to develop current guidelines for an ideal high school design and show how our High School does not satisfy certain statistical criteria. But that in no way proves that the existing building is not functioning extremely well in its current state.

The post-graduate success of every Mt. Lebanon High School Class has proven that the building provides an excellent learning environment. For decades I have visited schools throughout the region as a student, athlete, parent of student-athletes, and on a professional basis as a structural engineer. I have been in virtually every major high school in the WPIAL, and quite a few other high schools throughout Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, and West Virginia. In my opinion, the design of Mt. Lebanon’s current High School is surpassed by no other school I have visited. In my opinion, we already have the best basic building design.

Because it has been nearly 40 years since the last major renovation, the School is in great need of major renovation/update to almost every architectural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and communication system. But having provided structural engineering services to the School District for the past 15 years, I can assure you that the entire building is in excellent structural condition, capable of serving the community for many more decades. To tear down a perfectly good structure and replace it with a new, slightly smaller structure would be an incredible waste.

Stay tuned.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

5 Comments:

Blogger Charlie Forquer said...

I am certainly no structural engineer but I have always wondered ..why can't Lebo be noted for "Reduce Re-use Recycle" . Tell us again what's wrong with the current high school that some 3 R's couldn't whip it into shape? My home is 69 + years old and I certainly don't believe it's ready for replacement. It's had plenty of infrastructure repairs but it is still the same basic home that was built 69 years ago

July 29, 2009 11:38 PM  
Anonymous Liz Huston said...

I think we all need to listen to what Mr. Taylor has to say. It's obvious that this guy knows what he's talking about.

July 30, 2009 1:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looking forward to reading Mr. Taylor's observations. Unfortunately, he made similar suggestions about a year and half ago and got very little reaction.
Along those lines, why is the PA Dept. of Ed., article on Renovation vs. Building New not prominently available on the school renovation website???
Lots of articles on new construction, LEED, green buildings, etc., but a PA Dept. of Ed article that favors saving old buildings and specifically mentions Lebo is nowhere to be found? Mr. Fraasch did feature in one of his blog post!
Here's a question on the HS project.
When the pool project fell apart with the municipality, another design was developed to build the HS pool on the little ballfield on Horsman.
If I remember correctly, it fell apart because:
1. It didn't meet building ordinances (too tall & only allowed one building on property?)and
2. the location wouldn't support the weight of a pool(?).
The current HS plan calls not only for a pool, but gyms, weight rooms etc.
The district spent around $245,000 on that pool facility planning that fell apart. Repeating the same mistakes???
D. Spahr

July 30, 2009 2:28 PM  
Anonymous John Ewing said...

A school for 1800 (soon to be 1600 ) students is almost as big as the school we built for 3800 students.

Mr. Taylor's Report is a credit to a Mt Lebanon education. If you want your own copy email me at john.ewing1@verizon.net and I will send it to you.

July 31, 2009 12:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike,

Post the entire letter. Mt. Lebanon is involved in one of the most important debates in recent history and the citizens need more than a few paragraphs.

Tom McClain

August 02, 2009 2:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home