On his blog, Commissioner Dan Miller
writes about a topic that's hot in Mt. Lebanon these days: looming public expenses and how to pay for them. He writes, "If we continue borrowing money to pay for reconstructing our streets (like we did in 2009), we could run up public debt by $18 to $36 million in principle alone over the next 20 years. To say nothing of the interest payments. Just to take care of our streets."
To help our municipality kick the habit of borrowing for predictable expenses, Commissioner Miller proposed a pay-as-you-go ordinance for street reconstruction:
Mt. Lebanon has a longstanding policy of implementing an annual street reconstruction program with a goal of rebuilding approximately one mile of our paved streets every year. This program has largely been funded over the last decade by the issuing of debt in the form of Municipal bonds that are payable over twenty years and accrue interest. While it is integral to the Municipality to have an annual street reconstruction program, it is also integral to the taxpayers that such annual, reoccurring expenses be appropriately lodged in its general fund accounting so that the true cost of government is more accountable and transparent to our residents.
This ordinance was introduced at the last Commission meeting.
It is scheduled for a public hearing and possible vote on Monday, 23 August, 2010. If you have something to say about the proposed ordinance, be at Monday's meeting.
Commissioner Miller's entire post is informative; do read it:
Irresponsible Debt and the Public Credit Card. (One interesting tangential statistic caught my eye: the total per capita cost for all municipal services in 2009 was $690 – about $58 a month.)
What do you think? Is annual street reconstruction something that ought to be anticipated in the budget, or is it okay to pay for it with borrowed money?
Labels: bond issue, Dan Miller, proposed ordinance, street reconstruction